Which is pretty much my problem...the original format is written for humans to read (well, politicians), so as far as I can tell there is no syntactical help, which is why I was hoping for an overarching parser to check for all errors on assumptions, but I can see that that isn't going to handle all cases.
Back to the drawing board I guess.
In reply to Re: Re: Parsing the Law
by swiftone
in thread Parsing the Law
by swiftone
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |