That (conservatively), probably covers 85% of the uses of such code.
I don't buy that statistic. Either way, it sounds like you're saying 1 failure in 5 attempts is ok!
Are you telling me that you don't see a relatively simple modification to cater for the rest?
Are you saying we're suppose to assume everyone knows that modification is needed and that it was there all along, whatever it might be?
Anyway, I don't call the following a simple modification.
my $pid = open IN, '-|', qq[ perl -E"say scalar localtime, sleep 1 for 1.. $ARGV[0]" ] or die $!; my $buf = ''; if (!do { local $SIG{ ALRM } = sub { kill -9, $pid; }; alarm 5; $buf .= $_ while <IN>; waitpid($pid, 0); alarm 0; die("Can't waitpid: $!\n") if $? == -1; die("Child killed by signal ".($? & 0x7F)."\n") if $? & 0x7F; die("Child returned error ".($? >> 8)."\n") if $? >> 8; 1 }) { waitpid($pid, 0); die("Timeout\n"); }
In reply to Re^6: fork - alarm - output
by ikegami
in thread fork - alarm - output
by chart3399
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |