The quote:
"When you use the pp module in perl to create an exe from a script the actual script itself is compiled and cannot be viewed in a general text editor."
was what prompted me to suggest reading the documentation more clearly, regardless of the fact you're running this executable on a Citrix platform, this statement is not accurate and implies that this method is somehow a secure way to hide source code. This method combined with the fact you're running it via Citrix is a different matter.
As previously stated, my concern was for someone accepting your first statement as an accurate description of how pp works, not as a comment on how you are using it's output in your Citrix environment. Though initially I accept that I misread where you were running this via Citrix.
I didn't intend for any of this to be insulting in any way, I apologise if it seemed like I did.
Cheers
Update: fixed a couple of typos
In reply to Re^7: Win32::OLE and Wscript Shell -> Getting data back
by marto
in thread Win32::OLE and Wscript Shell -> Getting data back
by Gaz5
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |