And another repeat trial on the overtaxed system, but this time executing with higher priority (nice = -15):
1279058992.204795 1279058992.704795 1279058993.204795 1279058993.704794 1279058994.204794 1279058994.704794 1279058995.204794 1279058995.704794 1279058996.204794 1279058996.704794 1279058997.204794 1279058997.704795 1279058998.204795 1279058998.704795 1279058999.204795 1279058999.704795
Which shows 2 microsecond accuracy again. Pretty damn impressive code indeed! Of course, I'd need some electronics to verify the accuracy (vs. precision) of the above, but it verifies software timing might be feasible even in the 100kHz realm, where I'm dealing with 2Hz. Thoughts?
In reply to Re^2: Any ideas for using perl as a simple pulse generator?
by bfreemer
in thread Any ideas for using perl as a simple pulse generator?
by bfreemer
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |