But why does a closure not simply have a pointer to the pad (thereby gaining access to all lexcials)?
In reply to Re^14: Accessing lexicals in other scopes dynamically by name
by morgon
in thread Accessing lexicals in other scopes dynamically by name
by LanX
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |