Which is an oblique answer: the file is not in plain format and raw code (generally) must be.
When I wrote control software for nuclear reactors, we had to write each program twice. Once in assembler, once using a combination of variable definition tables, prose and Pascal-ish code in Word. The idea was to use as different a mental model as possible.
The Word doc would serve as the final spec and documentation, but it would also be parsed and compiled so that we could run our test suite against it (in order to compare the results it gave with those from the assembler program).
In reply to Re^2: Unsure why this isn't working?
by ikegami
in thread Unsure why this isn't working?
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |