The point I was trying to make above is that (in my opinion) having first-class functions is not enough for a language to be called a "lambda language" (meaning functional language).
Otherwise practically every current language would be a "lambda language" and the term would not be very useful.
And so I would argue that the statement about JS being the first mainsteam lambda langues is simply wrong and the question weather it was predated by Perl irrelevant.
In reply to Re^3: The first lambda language to go mainstream ?
by morgon
in thread The first lambda language to go mainstream ?
by LanX
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |