Is there a reason, why rakudo should target many back ends? Ideally the parrot one should be completed and then it could be ported to other VMs. Diversifying so quickly will slow down an already slow process. If you target two more extra back ends its like-time-taken-to-implement-one multiplied by 3.
If I'm not wrong many such projects already exist eg: Sprixel, Niecza etc. Which are targeting other back ends. Why reinvent the wheel again?
In reply to Re: Backend diversity for Rakudo
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Backend diversity for Rakudo
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |