Ok, whenever this word 'completion' crops up there is great deal of confusion as to what is complete.
That's correct. Which is why it's best to avoid it in a discussion about software.
Both Linux and Hurd are being actively developed, but Hurd is not complete in the same sense Linux is complete.
I see only gradual differences. And for a gradual difference it doesn't make sense to say "wait until ..."
Probably you can have a second look at the word 'Complete'.
I just took a second look. It seems half of the explanations there equate "complete" to "dead" if applied to software. So best avoid it.
Don't get me wrong, I don't love to pick on some minor language nits, but if you ask the question again without using words like "completed" or "finished", it will probably come up in a way that makes much more sense, and is much easier to answer in a meaningful way.
In reply to Re^4: Backend diversity for Rakudo
by moritz
in thread Backend diversity for Rakudo
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |