Is there a reason, why rakudo should target many back ends?
The only worthwhile reason I've heard is "People want to do it." (Targeting multiple backends hurt Pugs more than it helped.)
Diversifying so quickly will slow down an already slow process.
Only if you assume that developer time, interest, and ability are fungible. Porting NQP-rx to .Net may attract people who have no interest in Rakudo on Parrot. Porting NQP-rx to LLVM may attract people who have no interest in Rakudo on the CLR or Parrot. Porting NQP-rx to the JVM may attract Larry Ellison.
In reply to Re^2: Backend diversity for Rakudo
by chromatic
in thread Backend diversity for Rakudo
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |