and then your repeated refusal to do anything other than hurl abuse
Show me this alleged abuse?
Since when has a technical opinion by a person demonstrably familiar with the subject matter; that neither mentions, nor alludes to any individual or group; constitute "hurling abuse"?
Show me where I said: "Perl 6 hates concurrency and refuses to do anything about it!" or "it's too late for Perl 6 or Parrot to do anything sane with concurrency.".
Or any of the myriad other distractions you routinely manufacture to divert from the reality of what I've actually said, and my attempts to engender dialogue on this subject. Here and in other forums.
If you are in a maze, and you encounter a dead end, do you repeatedly bang your head against it and try to break through; or give up and retrace your steps?
Had it been possible to have a coherent dialogue on this subject, I'd still be in there talking. And had it been possible to reach an agreement about a technically sound, achievable approach to achieving this goal; I'd be in there contributing in whatever way I could.
It hasn't; so I'm not.
In reply to Re^12: Backend diversity for Rakudo
by BrowserUk
in thread Backend diversity for Rakudo
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |