I'm after the folks who think that Perl 5 is too ugly, complex, or otherwise has too many rough edges such that they instead choose some non-Perl-compatible scripting platform altogether.
Did he call Perl 5 ugly? I don't think so. Nor is that a statement I hear often in #perl6 or in other Perl 6 communication channels (except maybe from TimToady, but I guess he has a good right to call it such :-)
In reply to Re^6: Reference in Perl 6
by moritz
in thread Reference in Perl 6
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |