I've never said it's the best solution, but only that it follows better the Fibonacci mathematical definition and that it's easier (theoretically) to implement.
But thanks for pointing that things out, I should have done it by myself.
P.S. Yeah, maybe the "no useless loop" wasn't that right as I thought :D
In reply to Re^4: fibonacci numbers using subroutine?
by alexbio
in thread fibonacci numbers using subroutine?
by derpp
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |