Let me remind you that the Perl philosophy encourages Timtowtdi, "there is more than one way to do it"
I think that has more to do with solving a given problem in more than one way, or using a different syntax (From the available ones) to solve a problem. What I'm speaking is more on the lines of using 10 different ways of class declarations, or switch statement declarations, each one looking different than the other. Thats a lot different than the TIMTOWDI philosophy. And is not good either.Perl may offer flexibilities to use various kinds of syntax to solve a problem. But it provides only one way to write a particular syntax.
In reply to Re^2: What is best for the future.
by Anonymous Monk
in thread What is best for the future.
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |