This works, but it means I actually do some 25k*5k=125M 'operations' (for each range, I go over all the coordinates in it).
I don't see why you have to go over each coordinate in a range. If you show some code, maybe a clever monk can find a way to optimize this step.
In reply to Re: Can I speed this up?
by moritz
in thread Can I speed this up? (repetitively scanning ranges in a large array)
by daverave
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |