...and you describe exactly the kind of situation where a surrogate key becomes necessary.
I simply object to the terminology which implies that primary keys are, necessarily, opaque values stored in a single column. Changing the title to refer to surrogate keys would fix that.
In reply to Re^3: An improved technique for database primary keys
by herveus
in thread An alternate technique for database primary keys
by locked_user sundialsvc4
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |