package Foo; use 5.012; use strict; use warnings; $Foo::V = "fred"; { local our $V = "waldo"; say $V; sub bar {say $V}; sub set_v {$V = shift}; } package Baz; Foo::bar; Foo::set_v "fnord"; Foo::bar; __END__
Running this gives output:
waldo fred fnord
Removing the local, and running it gives:
waldo waldo fnord
And it won't compile if, instead of removing the local, you remove the our.

Of course, you may argue this code isn't very useful, but it does show there can be differences between local, our and local our. Given that I don't use our much (typically just for @ISA, and @EXPORT and friends), and neither local, I don't think I've ever had the need to use local our.


In reply to Re: Legitimate use for combined 'local' and 'our' by JavaFan
in thread Legitimate use for combined 'local' and 'our' by jeteve

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.