Thanks delirium. I loved Anathem and I'm planning on reading it again soon. (Although, I think I may read the Baroque Cycle. I read the first chapter of Quicksilver and liked it.) One good measure of a book is if it gets you interested in reading other books. Anathem definitely did that for me.
Godel, Escher, Bach is like an inspiration reference. I was wary of reading it since math isn't my biggest strength but my friend put me at ease and Anathem gave me the extra push.
I know we discuss a lot of Perl books here. Obviously that's appropriate for this site but we learn Perl to solve problems and explore ideas. I really think to do that effectively you have to consume all different kinds of information. (Sounds a little obvious but I've been guilty of putting blinders on.) It's a lot of work but well worth it and should be fun — right?
P.S. I checked out a few chapters from Data Munging with Perl. It looks like something I would like to pick up but, and I'm going to contradict myself after what I said regarding Programming Perl, should I be concerned that it's almost ten years old?
In reply to Re^2: What Worked In My 1st Year Of Perl: LOL
by luis.roca
in thread What Worked In My 1st Year Of Perl: LOL
by luis.roca
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |