Disorganized in the sense that it tries to follow some kind of mobile phone type formatting

I have no control over the look of site

Its almost has a playboy article feel, but without the benefit of nude females.

you know best as you look experienced with those kind of sites ;)

Because it is not in depth; it doesn't deliver what it promises and borders on incoherent wishy-washy. Based on the vocabulary its clearly written for experts but its full of vague generalities and not the kind of details experts would need to be demystified.

theory is followed by code snippets to make the concepts clear.maybe you did not get it.please make your critic constructive by pointing out specific things to talk about and don't just say things just to say them

A beginner would be very confused but impressed by the authors immense knowledge, and left in awe of the coolness of these things and the author for knowing them.

I play no expert or the smarty one.I just display my findings after I have done my research.I don't have a particular target group

and to tell you truth, the phrase : No, we may not. It's complicated - and if you don't believe me try explaining this strange set of rules to a beginner was added by the editor;it is not my style

An expert would breeze through this article and think about thanking the author for a laugh, then do his own research.

Mike James who has been on the scene for a couple of decades, runs the site and VSJ magazine and has a couple of PhD's thinks that the article is very good.But you seem more qualified to judge since you have a degree in Astrophysics, work for NASA and have send a bot to Mars :-) And as you seem to know what an expert would think, this automatically upgrades to you an expert and since you surely know all the things that are demonstrated in the article, after you complete your expert ,I am certain, research, please let me know of it. i will be glad to take a look at it

thanks for your opinion anyway

In reply to Re^4: Strong typing and Type Safety.A multilanguage approach by nikosv
in thread Strong typing and Type Safety.A multilanguage approach by nikosv

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.