that is correct and is the exact point of the article which you unfortunatelly completely missedYou are right. I missed it. Maybe I so was enchanted by all those advertisements that kept relentlessly popping up in my face that I missed the point of the actual content. Maybe I got distracted by having to click "Next" again and again because I could find no option to display the whole article on one page.
what is your definition of type inference thenI think I've found the definitive definition of "type inference" on page 6 of "Type Systems Demystified" by Nikos Vaggalis:
type inference: used extensively by Linq where a lot of times you cannot use explicitly typing, so you let the compiler decideIf you find a better definition, please let us know.
In reply to Re^3: Strong typing and Type Safety.A multilanguage approach
by eyepopslikeamosquito
in thread Strong typing and Type Safety.A multilanguage approach
by nikosv
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |