my point
If information is "lost" through a lossy conversion, the images are different, and the code I posted will detect those differences.
Note well: The OP didn't ask to find images that "looked the same" or were "substantially similar", or any other form of fuzzy comparison.
He asked for:
I would like my script to compare two images and tell me if even one single pixel is slightly different in one of them.
Which is exactly what the code I posted--as opposed to your theory--does.
Hence, your "point" is pointless.
In reply to Re^5: Matching Images
by BrowserUk
in thread Matching Images
by virtualweb
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |