I suspect that if there was a real need for this and an XS solution does actually provide substantial speed gains over substr or the reverse and chop trick then it'd have already been done.
Most times a smarter algorithm gives much more bang for the buck than tinkering with an implementation to make the old algorithm a little faster.
In reply to Re^3: Efficient walk/iterate along a string
by GrandFather
in thread Efficient walk/iterate along a string
by gje21c
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |