So the next step is to write a script or scripts to run your tests and perform code coverage. To the extent that I've used TDD I found that code coverage analysis gave the most bang for the buck in terms of where to focus tests and how well the tests were performing.
During the development phase I achieved and maintained 100% coverage, but that slipped when the project switched to a maintenance phase and by now I suspect the coverage statistics may be rather frightening.
In reply to Re: Automating TDD
by GrandFather
in thread Automating TDD
by tmaly
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |