Should we run to implement the derivative parsers described in the paper in Perl?

I don't care what you do, but why do you even consider asking me to do it? I guess from the way of phrasing the question is that you see a case for people to implement derivated parsers, but I don't see it, and you don't share your views. All you do is briefly summarize a paper, and then ask whether we should rally.

Come on man, if you have views strong enough you consider a mobilization of Perl programmers, spit them out. Be vocal. Write a paper. Publish it. Write some more. Get people behind whatever views you have. *THEN* come back to organize an army.

Personally, I don't give a flying fuck whether someone states that yacc is dead. Or whether that someone has opinions about parsers written in Perl.

---

---

Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!

Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.

Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.

Please read these before you post! —

• How do I compose an effective node title?
• How do I post a question effectively?
• Markup in the Monastery

Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:

a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr

You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)

	For:		Use:
	&		&
	<		&lt;
	>		&gt;
	[		&#91;
	]		&#93;

Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?

See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.