So you are declaring all the millions of line of pre-5.8 Perl that used signals, and all the billions of lines of C that still use "unsafe" signal handling, "definitely not wise.
Which according to your logic means that the authors of Perl::Unsafe::Signals, along with those p5pers that left the PERL_SIGNALS=unsafe workaround in place should be condemned for their actions?
Or maybe there is another reason for your continued stance.
In reply to Re^10: Perl Alarm Not Working
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Perl Alarm Not Working
by aceofspace
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |