Does Perl really need to support a 21 year old standard that was superceded 11 years ago?
How many people are still confined, other than by choice, to using a C89 only complier?
FWIW the parrot developers had a similar discussion recently, and decided not to switch to full C99, because MSVC doesn't support that. But they switched to a C99 subset that most compilers understand. They might value developer sanity higher than support for legacy platforms, at least compared to p5p.
In reply to Re^5: Perl 5 interpreter
by moritz
in thread Perl 5 interpreter
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |