s/((.)\2{$n})\2*/$1/g;
Shouldn't the \2* (zero or more of...) term in the regex above be \2+ (one or more of...) instead? I.e.:
s/((.)\2{$n})\2+/$1/g;
Won't the \2* version lead to useless replacement of sub-strings of n identical characters with the same n-character sub-string (Update: where n is the maximum number of contiguous identical characters originally defined)?
Update: This really should have been posted as a reply to Re: Supress similar chars in the string.
In reply to Re^3: Supress similar chars in the string
by AnomalousMonk
in thread Supress similar chars in the string
by Lana
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |