I'm writing to pass me stuff either as a blah or a ref to blahMy first question is: why such flexibility in the API. My comment is: I don't like the way the user has to pass a type and tell you the type. Why don't you simply require that the user pass a reference to the datatype and then your job is easier. Further, there will be no chance of a user making a typographical error such as typing ARRY when he meant ARRAY.
In reply to Re: UNIVERSAL::isa() vs. ref()
by princepawn
in thread UNIVERSAL::isa() vs. ref()
by dragonchild
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |