I suspect one of two reasons for the differences: ...

Neither of those is the case.

I've verified (by sending the request through a proxy) that the content is sent UTF-8 encoded (i.e. no %-encoding).  And my Encode::decode also behaves normally (i.e. it would die with "Cannot decode string with wide characters").  This is, however, irrelevant, because CGI.pm has code to prevent double-decoding: 

sub _decode_utf8 {
    my ($self, $val) = @_;

    if (Encode::is_utf8($val)) {
        return $val;
    }
    else {
        return Encode::decode(utf8 => $val);
    }
}

[download]

This sufficiently explains the behavior I observed and reported (for the input side).

In reply to Re^7: Confusing UTF-8 bug in CGI-script by Anonyrnous Monk
in thread Confusing UTF-8 bug in CGI-script by wanradt

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.