Yes, that works a lot better. :-)
Of course, the subroutine could be reduced to just:
sub is_balanced { eval "qw($_[0])" }
And it will also work with qq as well as with qw.
$ perl -le' sub is_balanced { eval qq($_[0]) } my $balanced = "(1 + 2 * (3 + (5/4) + 8) + 6)"; my $unbalanced1 = "(((1 + 2 * (3 + (5/4) + 8) + 6))"; my $unbalanced2 = "(((1 + 2 * (3 + (5/4) + 8) + 6))))"; print "Is $balanced balanced? ", is_balanced( $balanced ) ? "yes" : "n +o"; print "Is $unbalanced1 balanced? ", is_balanced( $unbalanced1 ) ? "yes +" : "no"; print "Is $unbalanced2 balanced? ", is_balanced( $unbalanced2 ) ? "yes +" : "no"; ' Is (1 + 2 * (3 + (5/4) + 8) + 6) balanced? yes Is (((1 + 2 * (3 + (5/4) + 8) + 6)) balanced? no Is (((1 + 2 * (3 + (5/4) + 8) + 6)))) balanced? no
In reply to Re^3: Using qw to check for balanced parentheses
by jwkrahn
in thread Using qw to check for balanced parentheses
by unix_hacker_beard
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |