Your example creates a new anonymous hash that falls out of scope with each iteration of the loop. So in the simplest terms, it's not the same anonymous hash each time. The fact that a newly created anonymous hash has or doesn't have the same address as a previous one that has fallen out of scope is practically coincidental. More importantly, it shouldn't matter what is happening behind the curtain.
Dave
In reply to Re: Address of anonymous hash
by davido
in thread Address of anonymous hash
by aixtal
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |