It does take the -S $BUFFER_SIZE flag.
I guess you must have a later version of gnu sort than I?
C:\test>sort --version sort (GNU textutils) 2.0 Written by Mike Haertel.
Are sort operations usually CPU bound?
The in-memory sort stages certainly are. If you overlap the sorting of one batch with the reading of the second, you save some time.
Have one thread reading/or writing and 1/3/7/15/... threads sorting, you save more time.
In reply to Re^4: Linux sort or FILE::SORT
by BrowserUk
in thread Linux sort or FILE::SORT
by perl_lover_always
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |