Could it be that you confused 'client' and 'server' a few times. At least if you are talking about them in the network sense. If I get you correctly, the combo-client-server would wait for a change to happen locally, then contact (which only can be done as client) to some sibling of itself somewhere else (who listens as a server) and delivers the update to it
The most important question then is how to stop every server/client from trying to inform every other server/client and so generate traffic that grows quadratic with the number of servers.
In reply to Re: A server that has a fool as its client: itself
by jethro
in thread A server that has a fool as its client: itself
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |