yes, I understand this convenience of pure-perl modules over modules that require C compiler
This works for simple cases, but not for something real big, like entire programming language
Having *slow* (and memory hungry) pure-perl JS engine, compared to fast V8 or SpiderMonkey, means only one thing - pure-perl is a toy, and v8 or spidermonkey is a real something
(o-kay, if not a toy, then maybe this is a reference implementation? but JE is not positioning this)
Next, why do you might prefer pure-perl over C, in this particular case? portability? or maybe you want to experiment with source code by adding something to it?
Current version number - 0.05x - means that even author expects it to be far from being ECMA standard-compliant - otherwise it would be 1.00 or something.
OK,
just as another guess - maybe author writes such a module to become familiar with Ecmascript language?
In reply to Re^3: Error while installing JE
by vkon
in thread Error while installing JE
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |