That's all very logical, except that at the end you seem to have arrived at the situation where you would have an implicit test of a NaN against zero be true?
NaN == 0 -> true cannot be right.
In reply to Re^2: NaNs are true (NaN == 0 -> true? Really?)
by BrowserUk
in thread NaNs are true
by syphilis
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |