Encryption does NOT require a secret.
Again? You really should start reading the material to which you reference before contradicting.
to make it unreadable to anyone except those possessing special knowledge
To consider ROT13 and perlc to be forms of encryption, one must consider the algorithm itself to be the secret. First rule of encryption: Never consider the algorithm a secret.
But enough theory. In practice, perlc provides the original intact without knowing either the algorithm or the salt you call "key". Objections over names don't really matter.
In reply to Re^10: What happened to perlcc?
by ikegami
in thread What happened to perlcc?
by rgiskard
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |