Personally, I'd prefer having one additional wrapper plus a bunch of symlinks — in particular as it helps keep the installation/usage specifics out of the scripts or modules. So, if you should have to deploy them in another environment with different needs, you would just have to adapt one wrapper (in case it's required at all in that environment).
YMMV, though :)
In reply to Re^7: layout/configuration of deployed files
by Eliya
in thread layout/configuration of deployed files
by klassa
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |