I meant information missing from the OP's post. Why would you think I meant information missing from the module? That makes no sense!
I thought you were replying to the content of the parent post. I have no idea what information you think is missing, and for what purpose it's missing.
assuming the module was doing what it was supposed to, I couldn't imagine why would it return "\\foo\go\do".
So you can't even imagine them helping either, but you recommended trying them anyway? I suppose there's nothing lost by trying, thought I'm not sure how one goes about trying to get buggy results.
I got I got the correct and expected [...] \foo\go\do
That's what the OP is getting. It's not what he's expecting/desires.
In reply to Re^6: Failure of catfile on Windows 7
by ikegami
in thread Failure of catfile on Windows 7
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |