The Windows memory-manager is known to be quite “lazy” and sometimes this characteristic produces memory-consumption that is quite larger than you intuitively suppose it should be. I also suspect that it over-states the “amount used.”
Documentation? Evidence? Source of this unfounded rumour?
Why do you continue to expound crap on subjects you obviously have no f***ing idea about?
In reply to Re^3: Sharing large data structures between threads
by BrowserUk
in thread Sharing large data structures between threads
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |