"In effect, the entire construct becomes a noop. "
In which case the first line of Serge314's example should match, shouldn't it?
In reply to Re^2: A bug in regex with conditional subpattern?
by jethro
in thread A bug in regex with conditional subpattern?
by Serge314
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |