Is that just as efficient as writing it this way?:
Actually, yours is close to 10x more efficient. There is no merit to the 'cute' method beyond it cuteness.
In reply to Re^3: getting the highest value in a simpler way
by BrowserUk
in thread getting the highest value in a simpler way
by replicant4
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |