Either you are describing some specific experience of your own involving a retry loop combined with serialisation or are just imagining something incorrectly, but either way there is absolutely no justification for your attributing the behaviour you describe to the functionality I proposed. Come on, do you think IBM transaction monitors would have survived on the market for years if this were true?
One world, one people
In reply to Re^8: Sharing large data structures between threads
by anonymized user 468275
in thread Sharing large data structures between threads
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |