Good post, sundialsvc4. I would characterize what your saying as granularity, modularity, and/or atomicity. Code is easier to understand when it is small (e.g. functions of 80 lines or less) and does not require knowledge of other parts of the system to understanding.

That said, while such granuarlity/modularity is important, it's only one factor in the list of things that I could consider in evaluating the goodness of code. There's also style, simplicity, artistry, suitability of the algorithm, etc.

Also, I would argue that "contains no assumptions" should be "contains no *unstated* assumptions".

--Daniel

In reply to Re: Legacy Code: "Dominoes = Bad" by danb
in thread Legacy Code: "Dominoes = Bad" by locked_user sundialsvc4

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.