heh. My comment was more about the "compiling is unit testing" philosophy. Plus I've become a bit of a TDD crack monkey.
Though it reminds me of something that's come up for me a few times. I've lately been finding myself wanting to have a local subordinate source control repository (more like a sub-branch.) That way intermediate nonfunctional code versions would be checked in at save time, but not committed to the real branch.
I'm not at all convinced it's not a wrongheaded thought. But I'm frequently finding myself wanting to roll back micro-changes that weren't solid enough to check in to the primary SCM system.
In reply to Re^5: Reading Someone's Program
by Voronich
in thread Reading Someone's Program
by aartist
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |