How would teams use it to distribute and share their own modules and applications within the organization?I wouldn't have it based on CPAN. For code written inside the organisation, I'd use a source control system. Deployment, I'd either distribute using the source control system, or a package system that's appropriate for the OS (for instance, rpms + yum + cfengine) and the organization. And I'd use the same package system to distribute external packages.
Frankly, I wouldn't know what to use a "private CPAN" for. What's the point, and why would an organization want to limit itself to a system that's geared to a single language, and is designed to do quite different things than corporations need?
In reply to Re: RFC: Private CPAN In A Box
by JavaFan
in thread RFC: Private CPAN In A Box
by jthalhammer
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |