Well - believe it or not - I knew. But your undocumented cut&paste doesn't worth it.
Hm. I assumed you'd remember from the last time we dicussed this.
You bottled out of supporting your own pretensions that time also.
This thread is about implementating tail call recursions,
This thread is about syntactic alternatives to goto &sub for implementing tail-call patterns
Next?
sabotage threads you consider heretical.
I don't consider the thread OP heretical, just a bad conclusion drawn on the basis of poor examples.
In reply to Re^7: Syntactic sugar for tail call optimizations
by BrowserUk
in thread Syntactic sugar for tail call optimizations
by LanX
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |