My guess is that your browser(s) was caching the one (intermittently) bad IP at that time (while lwp-request was using one of the other two IPs). If you had managed to run lwp-request against the bad IP during the time of its badness, I think you would have gotten zero bytes of content in response (perhaps not even HTTP headers).
Apache can be configured such that getting "Host: 216.92.34.251" produces different results than getting "Host: perlmonks.org", but that isn't currently the case on any of the IPs currently assigned to the PerlMonks DNS names.
- tye
In reply to Re^2: Is anyone at perlmonks aware that... (browser vs lwp-request)
by tye
in thread Is anyone at perlmonks aware that...
by 7stud
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |