@ dereferences the array (again, why didn't my original @{...} dereference it?)
It was iterating through the list and it did dereference , but the number 2 is not an array reference, so the list was empty :) strict noticed this problem, so it ended your program . This is why we love strict.
Whatever text you're learning from, you need to go back and do the exercises you skipped :) the only way to absorb and remember is by typing it yourself :)
aww, array references stringify like that, to get at the values, we need to dereference$ perl -E " say for [1..4],[5..8] " ARRAY(0x3f8adc) ARRAY(0x9b9eac)
Trying it your way
Aww, it only printed the contents of the last reference. To print both, we need to iterate over a list of reference, not a list of values$ perl -E " say for @{ [1..4],[5..8] }" 5 6 7 8
Oh look, the numbers are all joined together, thats how say works$ perl -E " say @$_ for [1..4],[5..8] " 1234 5678
I know, we'll put it in double quotes string, that will improve it$ perl -E " say 1,2,3,4; say 5..8; " 1234 5678
Now for the brackets$ perl -E " say qq{@$_} for [1..4],[5..8] " 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Now for the comma by changing the $", the LIST_SEPARATOR (the \" is for my shell, cmd.exe )$ perl -E " say qq{[@$_]} for [1..4],[5..8] " [1 2 3 4] [5 6 7 8]
Even if we employ $" properly by limiting the scope of the changes with local, its better to use join function$ perl -E " local $\"=q{,}; say qq{[@$_]} for [1..4],[5..8] " [1,2,3,4] [5,6,7,8]
The values function is context sensitive$ perl -E " say q{[}, join( q{,}, @$_ ), q{]} for [1..4],[5..8] " [1,2,3,4] [5,6,7,8]
Using @{} puts values %f in scalar context, just like the scalar function. This makes the values function return the number of values in %f; The number of values is not an array reference.$ perl -E " %f = 6..9; say for values %f; " 9 7 $ perl -E " %f = 6..9; say for scalar values %f; " 2
To learn more about context see Tutorials: Context in Perl: Context tutorial, or see the free book Modern Perl, a loose description of how experienced and effective Perl 5 programmers work....You can learn this too.
In reply to Re^7: Dereferencing a Hash of Arrays
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Dereferencing a Hash of Arrays
by toro
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |