As explained in Nifty New Feature you can also refer to
a node as a bare number, but this can cause problems
if there is a node named as that number.
node 666 or named 666 illustrate that
point and use [node|other name] as well.
Though I suspect the naming convention is not what you're really after since you've been here long enough to have probably used it.
In reply to Re: Tag for referring to nodes?
by lemming
in thread Tag for referring to nodes?
by princepawn
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |