That's what I suspected was the case. So in a situation where I want to continually interleave a somewhat trivial computational task as a background thread but still stay responsive to intermittent events (say an order or two of magnitude less actual computational work), I'd be better off just forking off the computational task, having the parent run the event system, then passing back the computational results as an event to the parent via IPC?
In reply to Re^2: Coro, AnyEvent and performance
by mcrose
in thread Coro, AnyEvent and performance
by mcrose
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |